Tuesday, November 15, 2011
I’m glad to see Facebook finally fixed this issue, allowing you to sort chronologically instead of by “importance”. I had tolerated their previous changes because I had no choice (let’s face it, you’ll only take Facebook out of your friends’ cold, dead hands), but I’ve known all along that the new method of sorting by importance to you - which was admittedly decent, perhaps decent enough to be creepy - came at the cost of re-reading posts often, and that’s just not a great tradeoff for me.

I’m glad to see Facebook finally fixed this issue, allowing you to sort chronologically instead of by “importance”. I had tolerated their previous changes because I had no choice (let’s face it, you’ll only take Facebook out of your friends’ cold, dead hands), but I’ve known all along that the new method of sorting by importance to you - which was admittedly decent, perhaps decent enough to be creepy - came at the cost of re-reading posts often, and that’s just not a great tradeoff for me.